WEDNESDAY JUNE 26th RACING POST 2013
WEEK MONDAY JUNE 24th TO SUNDAY JUNE 30th
REVIEW
QUEEN ELIZABETH 11
2013
http://royal-ascot.racingpost.com/news/horse-racing/
Guide to Royal Ascot
http://royal-ascot.racingpost.com/guide/
Guide to Royal Ascot
http://royal-ascot.racingpost.com/guide/
MONTY ROBERTS
2013
REVIEW YESTERDAY'S RESULTS
PREVIEW TODAY'S CARDS
Watch Wimbledon
Today's Matches Live
Federer out: Sergiy Stakhovsky (Ukraine)
A Wow Match Amazing
http://www.wimbledon2013livestream.com/
The Irish Derby the Curragh
this Saturday June 29 6:30pm.
| 6:30 | CUR | Dubai Duty Free Irish Derby (Group 1) 1m4f |
|---|
http://www.curragh.ie/
http://www.curragh.ie/whats-on/derby-festival/
 | WORLDWIDE STAKES RACES SATURDAY JUNE 29. |
British Racehorse Owners Association AGM
Owners’ chief hopeful of hitting £120m prize target in 2014.
Rachel Hood (Bloodhorse Literate) - V - Hugh
Robertson MP (Bloodhorse Illiterate)
What chance has British Horseracing got
with Hugh Robinson acting for the government?
with Hugh Robinson acting for the government?
“RACEHORSE OWNERS ASSOCIATION president Rachel Hood told the wider industry yesterday that a record level of prize-money of £120 million was a realistic target for British racing in 2014.
Bill Barber reports: “Hood:
record prize-money of £120m is within reach
“Hood said the next six months would set
the tone for the second half of her four-year term as president and called on
the government to act to improve racing’s finances, bookmakers to engage
constructively in talks with racing and for all racecourses to sign prize-money
agreements with horsemen.
“On the last point Hood made it clear the
courses who did not agree to a commitment to ensure an agreed percentage of
additional income from media rights went to prize-money could expect sanctions
against them.
“She said: ‘Any racecourse that isn’t
prepared to act appropriately must be left in absolutely no doubt that horsemen
will, quite rightly, choose to race their horses elsewhere.”
“Hood reiterated calls she had made for
the government to act to improve racing’s funding.
“She told the audience: “I would urge the
minister {for sport and tourism Hugh Robertson} to remove this issue from his
‘too-difficult tray’ and display some desire and commitment to facilitate a
fair, sustainable and enforceable mechanism that would enable racing to receive
a reasonable return from all British racing, not just the diminishing portion
that takes place with bookmakers based in the UK.”
JMC Turfcall Comment. The British government
over the last 6 decades has used horseracing to make money for only themselves.
Governments (politicians) the same as British
Law (lawyers) all are bloodhorse
illiterate.
British Governments upsides the British
Legal Justice System and the Banks have taken many working peoples lives for granted, and
got away with doing that. Getting away with financially ripping off millions of working peoples lives for their own financial gain.
The European
Court of Justice (Bloodhorse Illiterate) in the case between BHB (Bloodhorse
Illiterate) and William Hill (Bloodhorse Illiterate) went against the BHB
because all the lawyers were bloodhorse illiterate as where the BHB and William
Hill. All were bloodhorse illiterate. The grassroots of horseracing never stood
a chance. Because there was no one there who was Bloodhorse Literate to speak
up for them at all.
British Horseracing Board v William Hill
Case Reference C-203/02
Court European Court of Justice
Judge Skouris (President), Jann, Timmermans, Rosas and Lenaerts (Rapporteur), (Presidents of Chambers), Puissochet, Schintgen, Colneric and Cunha Rodrigues (Judges), Stix-Hackl (A-G), Múgica Arzamendi and Contet (Principal Administrators)
Date of Judgment 9 Nov 2004
Court European Court of Justice
Judge Skouris (President), Jann, Timmermans, Rosas and Lenaerts (Rapporteur), (Presidents of Chambers), Puissochet, Schintgen, Colneric and Cunha Rodrigues (Judges), Stix-Hackl (A-G), Múgica Arzamendi and Contet (Principal Administrators)
Date of Judgment 9 Nov 2004
British Horseracing Board v William Hill
The Court of Appeal has referred this
matter to the European Court of Justice for its interpretation
of the directive on the legal
protection of databases
No comments:
Post a Comment