http://www.racingpost.com/news/live.sd
http://www.turfcall.co.uk
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00wck32/episodes/player
MONDAY SEPTEMBER 9th RACING POST 2013
WEEK MONDAY SEPTEMBER 9th TO SUNDAY SEPTEMBER 15th
REVIEW YESTERDAY'S RESULTS
Richard brings us his features in the Racing Post, every Saturday
don't miss them.
Richard Hughes busy day in the sun as Producer takes on the locals at Veliefendi Turkey and wins for Team Hannon (Equus)
3:30 - International Topkapi Trophy (Group 2) (3yo+) (Turf)
1m, £219,512.071 Producer 9/10F
2 Chil The Kite 2/1
3 White Ram 19/10
9 ran Distances: hd, nk, 2l
TIME 1m 35.33s
Jockey: Richard Hughes
Trainer: Richard Hannon
DIVIDENDS (INCLUDING 1 UNIT STAKE): WIN 1.90
DF 2.85
SF 4.60
PREVIEW TODAY'S CARDS
A WINDOW INTO THE WORLD OF TRUE EQUUS HORSERACING
EVIDENCE
Global Rules of Horseracing do not exist.
Equus Zone Intelligence urgently needed in India and Britain.
The Royal Western India Turf Club and the British Horseracing Authority are acting in ignorance of all key Equus issues
Perhaps the GREAT should be left off at present due to the BHA ripping off all those who have achieved true bloodhorse literacy in their own right, to include the horses and their owners. And for refusing to allow an Equus Zone. It is not possible for any global country to run the sport of horseracing without a true Equus Zone.
The Royal Western India Turf Club and the British Horseracing Authority are acting in ignorance of all key Equus issues
Bill Barber brings us news:
"Racing promotion delivers 'awful lot with very little' .
J Margaret Clarke Turfcall Comment
Does it?
REL = RACING ENTERPRISES LTD ( No mention of any horses)
"BRITISH
racing's promotional arm achieves a lot with very little according to Rod
Sreet, chief executive of Great British Racing and the body responsible for it,
Racing Enterprises Ltd. Does it? How?
"Street
was speaking after REL's financial accounts for 2012 were revealed in the BHA's
figures for last year, REL being a subsidiary of British racing's governing and
regulatory body. A subsidiary? What sort of subsidiary? An Equus subsidiary? A bloodhorse literate subsidiary? Or a bloodhorse illiterate subsidiary?
"Figures
showed REL turnover from data licensing of £1.587 million, an increase of
around 1.5 per cent on the previous year. The organisation made an operating loss of £17,000 after
administrative expenses of just more than £1.6m. An organisation? What sort of organisation? An Equus organisation? A bloodhorse literate organisation? Or a bloodhorse illiterate organisation?
"Street
said business costs of around £350,000 left REL with net income of £1.25m,
which the board had a policy of spending on promoting and marketing the sport. HOW? In an Equus way? Or in another way?
Surely the honest title should read:
BRITISH HORSERACING ENTERPRISES LTD (BHEL)
GBR = GREAT BRITISH RACING
"That £1.25m is the spend on GBR, including staff
costs, " he added. "I think it often surprises people because they
assume there's lots of money washing around being spent.
You say including the staff, what staff? In which zone? Equus? Or another zone?
"I
feel £1.25m is a very small amount with which to market a sport of our size
nationally and we're actively seeking ways via our stakeholders to see how that
can be improved.
To market a sport? What sort of a sport exactly? A horseracing sport? An Equus Sport? Or another sport? For your stakeholders governing, regulatory and political who are these people? Their names?
"If
you look at the economic impact of British racing (calculated at £3.45 billion
in 2012) and set against that national promotions and marketing of £1.25m it's
a very small sum and I think we achieve an awful lot with very little. In what domain/zone? The Equus Zone? Or a different Zone?
GBRI = GREAT BRITISH RACING INTERNATIONAL
"Spending
on Great British Racing International invested body set up to promote British
racing abroad when Racing for Change became GBR this year, will be a feature of
the 2013 accounts. How interesting.
"Street
said: We've invested an additional amount to get GBRI off the ground. The BHA
is an investor, as is the Levy Board, so there will be some increased
expenditure. How interesting.
British Champion Professional Pioneer Flat Turf Rider Richard Hughes (Group 1 Equus ) riding for Team Hannon (Equus)
promoted British horseracing yesterday
in Turkey
"However,
the increased expenditure on GBRI has been reduced in other areas of our
promotions, because we still work to the policy of break-even. So we've had to
cut our cloth accordingly. How would you know how to cut your cloth accordingly when you do not even bother to honour the British Equus Zone.
"For
2013 and 2014 there will be additional expenditure on GBRI because it is seen to be an important
aspect of it. " An important aspect of what exactly? The Equus Zone that you ignore and refuse to honour?
BCS = BRITISH CHAMPION SERIES
BRITISH
CHAMPION SERIES (BCS) (NO MENTION OF HORSES)
What stake do the Equus Zone hold in all this? Or is this the reason that the BHA do not allow an Equus Zone?
REL = RACING ENTERPRISES LTD
"REL,
which is jointly owned by the Horsemen's Group and the Racecourse Association,
has a 15 per cent stake in British Champion Series Ltd, to which it has loaned
a total of £2.129m by the end of last year.
What stake do the Equus Zone hold in all this? Or is this the reason that the BHA do not allow an Equus Zone?
"Street
said: "One of the compelling reasons for REL to invest in British Champion
Series is that REL represents both the racecourses and the horsemen, who felt
in the interests of the sport it was an absolute proper investment because it
was a series and a day that the sport benefits from. " The sport in general? Or the sport of Equus? Or the horsemen of Equus?
Surely this title should read:
GREAT BRITISH QIPCO HORSERACING CHAMPION SERIES (GBQHCS)
No comments:
Post a Comment